Reprinted from New York Property Rights Clearinghouse Vol. 10 No. 1 Winter 2006

Federal Judge Orders Overhaul of Selection of New York State Supreme Court Judges

A Brooklyn federal judge ordered on January 27 that the selection process for candidates for the Supreme Court judges throughout New York State must be overhauled to remove control from the party bosses and be changed to a democratic process. In his 77-page decision from the bench of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Justice John Gleeson directed that until the Legislature establishes a new judicial selection process, the candidate judges for each county’s State Supreme Court must be selected by the voters in the primaries.

The established system has meant that party conventions at each county are merely rubber-stamp votes for the selections of justices by the Democratic and Republican party bosses, Gleeson observed. He stated, “The plaintiffs have demonstrated convincingly that local major party leaders…control who becomes a Supreme Court justice and when.” Brooklyn Surrogate Judge Margarita Lopez Torres and a group of both Democrats and Republicans brought the lawsuit. Torres had bucked the Brooklyn Democratic leader Clarence Norman by refusing to hire a law secretary backed by the party. The New York Times reported that “Torres has long declined to play the Brooklyn Democratic organization’s game.” Torres previously broke ground by being the first Hispanic female to sit on the bench in Kings County. It is not yet known whether the ruling will be appealed. The decision was called a “stunning blow to political party bosses” by the New York Daily News.

Back to:
New York Citizens Strategies for Defending Private Property Rights PRFA Home Page
   

© 2006 Property Rights Foundation of America, Inc.
All rights reserved. This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.