Mexican Drug Cartels Are Growing Marijuana in
U.S. National Parks and Forests,
News Brief, PRFA, August 2007
Oregon Supreme Court Upholds Regulatory Takings
Compensation Law - Carol W.
LaGrasse, PRFA Update, February 21, 2006
November 2004:
Oregon Measure
37
Takings compensation and relief from land use regulation -
Enacted by Oregons voters in a statewide referendum on
November 2, 2004
January 2001:
Oregon
Voters Protect Property Rights

Additional Helpful
Organizations
Oregon Council of Motor Vehicle
Associations
(organization of Oregon
automobile hobbyists)
address
Oregonians in Action
(Influential property
rights group, brought Dolan v. Tigard successfully)
address
Voice of the Wallowas
Published by: Wallowas Future Foundation
Voice of the Wallowas, first published in November
2005, is An in-depth periodical dedicated to the Wallowa
Valley, its people and their joint future.
(The rural area is faced with the Endangered Species Act, Watershed
Restrictions, Tribal Claims, The Wildlands Program, and other
environmental agendas.)
John Lenahan, Ph. D.
Managing Editor & Director of Development
address
& website

Websites
A
Review of the Law of Easements
Continuing education course available,
document covers fundamentals of easement law and more. Concepts
discussed enable an understanding of many principles of easement
law in this country.
By Schroeder Law Offices,
P.C.
Serving Oregon, Washington, Idaho & Nevada since 1991
Oregon State Legislature
(Senate and House of Representatives)
link
|
|
State News
|
New
Wave of UNESCO World Heritage Sites Proposed - By Carol
W. LaGrasse (PRFA Position Brief, June 2007)
This spring, the National Park Service announced that 36 locations
in the United States have been proposed for UNESCO World Heritage
Sites, adding to the twenty that already are designated in this
country. Such international recognition potentially threatens
private property rights because preservationists could exploit
the designation to stop the use of land in the region just beyond
a sites borders.
More on this
topic: Biosphere
Reserves & World Heritage Sites
|
- A History
of Government Theft - By Sarah Foster, April 2006,
Reprinted from Whistleblower by permission of WorldNetDaily.com,
publisher.
The U. S. Supreme Courts Kelo v. New London
ruling was not the beginning of the abuse of eminent domain to
destroy communities for private development. It began in Washington,
D.C., during the 1950s, where slum clearance was the excuse for
cruelly displacing 20,000 residents, mainly families from good
homes, others people in scattered poor conditions, who suffered
especially, and even died, from the evictions.
More on this
topic: Eminent
Domain - National
|
Regulatory
Taking CompensationThe Successful Oregon Measure 37 Referendum
- By Bill Moshofsky, President, Oregonians in Action, Tigard,
Oregon; Speech to the Ninth Annual Conference on Private Property
Rights (PRFA, Albany, N. Y. October 22, 2005)
The Oregon Measure 37 referendum created a solution to the
regulatory overkill that besets Oregons
property owners, under arguably the strictest land use planning
regulations in the country, excessive wetlands, endangered species
and forest practice regulation. Oregonians in Action is still
fighting against governments attempt to nullify
the law.
More on this
topic: Regulatory
TakingsNational
|
|
|
|
|
- Conservation Easements-One Rancher to Another-By
Joe Mehrten, Mehrtens Ranch, Clements, California.
An exchange of letters bringing out the many interrelated
issues, especially conservation easements, infringing on the
future of the rural West. (Click to select from three full letters.)
- Letter by Joe
Mehrten (Jan. 6, 2002) points out, Conservation
easements with private land trusts are so intertwined with government
regulations and controls as to be little different from easements
sold to public agencies.
- Response
from Bev Sparrowk, Sparrowk Livestock (Jan. 8, 2002)
states, Jack and I have discovered in our exposure to
and dealings with government agencies conversation and a spirit
of cooperation usually reaps the results we had hoped for.
- Joe Mehrtens
reply (Jan. 29, 2002), after he learned that a government
grant, rather than conservation easements, is involved: [T]he
grant application makes it abundantly clear that this project
invites destruction of our property rights.
More on this
topic: Conservation
Easements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|