Ideas for State Property Rights Legislation

W. Christopher Doss
Commonwealth of Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 1475
Richmond, VA 23212

1. INFORMED CONSENT
An informed consent provision that mandates disclosure of vital information when an environmental or historic easement is concerned.

Purposes
(1) To ensure understanding when a deed restriction is placed on a parcel of land being sold by a person, organization or governmental entity.

(2) To ensure that owners of servient estates are informed as to the perpetual legal restraints brought about when an environmental, historical, or conservation easement is granted to government or an organization.

(3) Finally, to divulge who the owner of the easement is and what their organization and purpose is all about.

Ramifications
Creates requirement of informed consent when a citizen of the Commonwealth of Virginia accepts a deed with restrictions or donates an easement for environmental or historical purposes.

The informed consent policy will mandate that the donee disclose to the donor the perpetual legal restraints burdening the donor’s servient estate. Also, if a deed with a restriction is granted to a citizen, the restriction and its longevity will be disclosed.

Mandates that the donee divulge information to the donor as to who the donee is and what their organization is all about.

Allows for the owner of the servient estate to attest to an understanding of the burden on his estate by signing a consent form.

Necessity
Many residents of the Commonwealth of Virginia are donating land in the form of environmental, historical, or conservation easements without understanding the perpetual legal restraints that will run with the land.

Many residents are donating land to organizations they know little information about which and when they do not know the purpose for which the organization wants the land.

This lack of understanding creates an element of surprise when years later the original owner of the servient estate or an heir, transferee, or assignee attempts to do something restricted by the easement.

2. MAINTENANCE COSTS
Protection of taxpayers against open-ended maintenance expenditures on property transferred to the state.

Purpose
To provide for the maintenance and upkeep of property that has been willed, donated, or in any way transferred to the state or its constituent entities.

Ramifications
Will force owners of property, whether individuals or organizations, to provide for the maintenance and upkeep of property that may be deeded to the state.

The provisions for the upkeep of the land can be in the form of a trust donated by the person or organization, or it could be from a partnership with another organization that will provide for the resources to maintain the property.

Necessity
The state and federal park services do not have the resources to maintain their existing land, much less any new land that is transferred to them. Hundreds and thousands of acres of land under the authority of the state are not being maintained, including many tourist attractions that are being closed because of the lack of resources appropriated to them.

3. ON-THE-RECORD STANDS
Mandating local officials to take on-the-record stands when they are responsible for laws or regulations that decrease property taxes and concomitantly the tax base in the community.

Purpose
To provide accountability between local government officials and their constituents.

To require the acquiescence of local government officials at a local town meeting or otherwise “on the record” when a proposed regulation or law affecting private property or property taxes is enacted through their authority.

Ramifications
Forces local governmental officials to attest to their constituents when they authorize a law or regulation to be promulgated that affects private property and general property tax collections in the community.

Will cause local governmental officials to consider their constituents and how the regulation or law will effect them before authorization.

Necessity
Many local governmental officials are authorizing laws and regulations that affect their constituents without the constituents knowledge that the officials are the ones that authorized the law or regulation. Therefore, the officials who should be directly accountable to the members of the community are able to blame the law on the state or some other governmental entity, rather than being forced to bear the political brunt of their decisions.

4. MANDATED REVIEW OF PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT
Mandated review of property tax assessment when property has been potentially devalued by a law or regulation.

Purpose
To provide for an automatic decrease of property taxes on private property that has been devalued by a state regulation or law.

Ramification
Forces state and local officials to implement an automatic review of property taxes in a community before a state law or regulation is promulgated that will decrease the value of property in an area. State and local officials will be forced to consider the automatic decrease in the tax base of an area before they promulgate a law or regulation affecting the value of private property.

Necessity
There are many laws and regulations that are promulgated each year that decrease the value of private property without in turn decreasing the assessed value of the property. Many residents continue to pay an higher assessed value than what their property is worth until a new tax assessment is done, which in many cases is several years.

5. COMPENSATION FOR REGULATORY TAKINGS
Compensation for property designated for public use which forces a cost or depreciation onto individual property owners.

Purpose
To provide owners of land to be compensated when a law or regulation proscribes a lawful use of their property to serve a public good; and which devalues a portion of the property by more than 20%. Lawful is defined as that which was legal prior to the enactment of the law or regulation, but does not encompass any activity that would be covered by ordinary private or public nuisance laws.

Ramifications
Will look at the portion of property affected, rather than the person’s property as a whole, when deciding whether the percentage affected (>20%) equals a taking. The portion analysis is a way of looking at the specific portion of property that has been affected; for example if a person owns 10 acres with one acre of wetlands and the government restricts the use on the one acre of wetlands, the proper analysis will be to look at the one acre and measure the percentage according to only that one acre, rather than the 10 acres as a whole.

Will halt the frivolous use of laws and regulations that are propounded without looking at the consequences.

Causes state and local governments to consider the cost of compensating owners of private property before enacting a law or regulation which would force the cost of a public good into individual citizens.

(Forces the public, rather than the individual property owner, to pay for the regulation or law that has been deemed “for the public good.”) (should this not be included)

Necessity
Many residents in the Commonwealth of Virginia have been subjects of unbridled laws and regulations that have decreased or destroyed the values of their property.

Private property owners have shouldered the burden of preserving property for the good of the public.

Back to:

State Legislation to Protect Private Property Owners
PRFA Home Page
   

© 1995 Property Rights Foundation of America, Inc.
All rights reserved. This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.