Posted by
Property Rights Foundation of America®

SUSAN ALLEN
P.O. Box 718
Keene Valley, N.Y. 12943

August 28, 2009 Hand Delivered

Adirondack Park Agency
P.O. Box 99
Ray Brook, N.Y. 12977
Attn: Richard Weber

I make the following statements in opposition to the Lows Lake Classifications/Reclassifications

  1. Dams, roads and private inholdings contradict the description of the area as "Wilderness." It can never be a Wilderness as long as these exist.
  2. Manmade lakes, such as Lows Lake, cannot honestly be considered as part of a "Wilderness."
  3. The State Land Master Plan has not been updated for nearly 25 years. This needs to be done prior to any actions on classifications, Unit Management Plans or any DEC/APA "policies," as all of these are inherently intertwined.
  4. Unit Management Plans can always be revised by the APA; just because some action was taken in a prior UMP does not mean it cannot be rescinded or amended.
  5. Unless the State of New York owns the entire beds of the lakes and rivers, and the entire shorelines surrounding them, Lows Lake and the other waterbodies cannot be classified. APA staff James Connolly stated at the June 2009 APA meeting that classifying the waters of Lows Lake was a "progression" in the way the APA treats waterbodies. No government agency can rule by establishing incremental "progressions" absent the proper legal processes. This is a dangerous precedent that harks back to the DEC's and/or APA's unilateral determinations on all-terrain vehicle prohibitions and definition of "roadside campsites."
  6. The recreational use study commissioned by DEC and/or APA showed little or no user conflicts on Lows Lake between motorized and non-motorized uses, giving less rationale for creating a classification that would banish certain user groups but not others. The results of that study should be taken into account.
  7. The "Timeline" of Lows Lake contained several statements that the lake is dangerous for canoes, giving less rationale for establishing it as part of a "Wilderness Canoe Route."
  8. The "Timeline" contained a later entry stating that the number of campsites designed for canoeists' use was being increased, exhibiting a bias toward accommodating one user group while denying others.
  9. The APA Act states that economic issues have to be considered. As co-owner of Adirondack Maps, Inc., which publishes maps of that area, I have direct knowledge that hiking and canoeing activity is confined to the warm months of early summer through early fall, while hunters and anglers extend the seasons on both ends, and addition of snowmobiling would make it a true year-round recreational area. The economic effect of all types of recreation on the communities cannot be ignored.
  10. The State Environmental Quality Review law requires that every issue that is identified by the public must be addressed, not dismissed without comment.
    This process is not supposed to be a popularity contest, where whichever point of view gets the most comments wins.

Back to:

Adirondack Park Agency (APA)

Access to Government Lands - New York

Preservation vs the Future of the North Country

PRFA Home Page